The view of race has seen a
remarkable shift from a biologically based construct to a socially based one.
Scholars Omi and Winant state in their article Racial Formation in the United States, “the concept of race has
defied biological definition”. Despite this, in a previous historical era a
person’s racial identity was based on the country from which he/she or his/her
ancestors originated. Mixed race people were classified separately. Eventually,
once the civil rights movement took hold, and there was more immigration into
the United States from different regions, there was a shift. People started to
be able to define themselves. There were more options and more diversity among
people. The concept of race became social; about how a person views his or her
self, not just whether they look black or white. Now however, with the recent
advances in science, there has been a partial pendulum swing in the other
direction. Certain genetic diseases are being sequenced that have roots in
certain global populations that can be traced to a specific race. In another
article from 2012 entitled Racial
Formation in the Twenty-First Century, Omi and Winant cite Neil Risch when
they assert “genetic differences have arisen among people from different
continents…recognition of race…is important for understanding genetic
susceptibility to certain diseases and receptivity to medical interventions
such as drug treatments.” This trend in race classification can become
problematic if socioeconomics is factored into the equation, as has started to
happen in recent years. Those that can afford medical treatment are at an
advantage, ever increasing, until those who can’t are once again deprived of
influence.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment