I started watching “The Wire” the
summer and was immediately hit with the shows relevance to the topics we have
been discussing. The character of Stringer Bell is for me a great example of
the idea of “doing race”. Stringer Bell is portrayed as not being the stereotypical
gangster, and the show is a constant juxtaposition of this fact. On the one
hand we are presented with the stereotypical black gangster. These individuals
give credence to the idea that “race is a complex system of ideas and practices
regarding how some visible characteristics of human bodies relate to people’s
character, intellectual capacity, and patterns of behavior.” (Moya and Markus
22) Therefore a gangster is supposed to be one who wears baggy clothes, chains,
and carry a gun. His outward appearance dictates that he is a violent and a not
too bright criminal. Stringer Bell, however, looks nothing like this. He wears
fitted slacks, nice shoes, wears glasses and even attends a night class for
economics. When looking at him you see a well-educated businessman not a drug
dealer who applies these econ principles to his drug trade.
The show constantly presents these
two different views of the gangster challenging our preconceived notions of the
“typical” black gangster. We bring to the viewing of the show this set idea of
what makes a gangster. People are immediately classified into a category based
on public perception and race is something that people are conditioned to perceive.
That is why I liked Stringer as a character. When you look at him you are deceived
by his appearance. He is anomaly that turns our idea of a gangster and confuses
our notion that outward appearance solely determines the category that
individuals are classified into.

No comments:
Post a Comment