Creation of the Chicano

In discussing race and racism, Omi and Winant defined race as the creation and destruction of an identity. What is particularly interesting about this type of definition is its applicability to ethnic groups rather than only to traditionally conceived races. Within the Mexican American community, there is great variation in self-identity. Age often influences the way in which they conceive themselves. Prior to the late 60’s and early 70’s, the term “Mexican American” was emphasized to stress their connection to a white identity. Whereas being simply “Mexican” implied foreign status, being “Mexican American” gave focus to their belonging in the U.S. However, the rise of the civil rights movement created another term: “chicano”.  Moving away from assimilation into white society, youths began to support an identity which distanced themselves from whiteness, but also fostered greater unity between ethnically similar individuals. While their parents were set on blending in, Latino youths shaped their own identity of which to be proud. Rather than attempt to fit in, Chicanos were eager to decide for themselves. Part of this new identity was the notion of the nation of Aztlán.  Embracing and emphasizing the history of Mexicans in the southwest region, even before the establishment of U.S. states in the region, Chicanos created a specific heritage for themselves, separate from all other groups.  Since its conception, however, the term “Chicano” has not remained as popular or as prevalent. The Chicano movement’s rhetoric could be harsh at times, a fact which white society used to condemn the movement. Though ethnically Mexican people do still identify as Chicano, it has taken a particular political connotation.  Despite the fact that Latinos/Hispanics are not officially considered a race by the U.S. government, they have experienced a creation and destruction of identity which could be seen to satisfy a certain definition of race.