This season on CBS's hit reality show, Big Brother, racial controversy
arose mainly around one female contestant, Aaryn. This 22 year old Texan is the
quintessential "girl next door" - an attractive, sassy blonde - who
can't seem to understand that she isn't the queen of the house. A group of
mainly white contestants, along with a few token minorities constitute the cast
of Big Brother. In such a situation it was easy for Aaryn to recruit
individuals to help perpetuate the hegemonic imbalance that the CBS recruiters
ultimately imposed. "Big Brother" America is always watching, and the
contestants are being broadcast 24 hours a day, seven days a week on a live
feed streaming on the internet for fans to check up on them. Aaryn was caught
telling her Asian housemate to "go make some rice" and warning her
friend about talking in the dark about their African American housemate,
because they "might not be able to see that bitch." In the context of
purposefully and personally bashing another contestant of another race as a
means to excel in the competition, Aaryn and those who joined in the negativity
perpetuated the essentialist categories of race in order to "reproduce
structures of domination" as proposed by Omi and Winant on page 71 in
their 1994 paper. In a later interview, Aaryn excuses her own actions by
dismissing the existence of racism in her words or beliefs, saying that she “loved
everyone in there(the Big Brother house).” Though she may be fond of those she
offended, her words and actions were, by Omi and Winant’s definition, racist. Does
a friendship or fondness between individuals belonging to different races
permit them to ignore overt racism in comments they may make in jest? Why do we
see those in the majority justify racist actions through love or friendship?
Monday, September 9, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment