1. Louisville,CO
2. Chanhassen, MN
3. Papillion, NE
4. Middleton, WI
5. Milton, MA
I cross-referenced these cities with the most recent U.S. Census data (which I know is problematic for many reasons, but is the best source of racial demographic information), and found that all of these cities have very skewed population statistics. Louisville is 91% White and 0.9% African-American, Chanhassen is 94% White and 0.75% African-American, Papillion is 93% White, Middleton is 92% White, and Milton is 85% White. This is compared to a United States population that is 79% White and 13% African- American. These statistics suggest that CNN Money's best cities to live in 2009, are also the country's whitest.
Similarly to CNN's rankings, Forbes releases a list of "America's Most Miserable Cities." Their top rankings included Detroit, MI, Stockton, CA, Flint MI, and New York, NY. All of these cities have populations that are less than 45% white (and without Stockton, over 25% African-American).
Given these very public ratings and descriptions of U.S. cities, it seems that very little has changed in the evaluation of the quality of American cities. It seems that "higher quality" cities are also the whitest, and the "lower quality" cities have greater minority representation. Perhaps we have only become a little more P.C. Should we be concerned with this? Assuming the answer is yes, how can news agencies and publications work to improve?
No comments:
Post a Comment