Dominant white masculinity was challenged by the non-normative gender performance of zoot suiters, the man's suit tail skirts that moved like skirts. Women were no longer necessarily regulated to the domestic space, as they challenged patriarchy and went out on their own without male escorts; they chose what they wanted to wear and exercised agency. Men were not restricted to being service men in the military and used clothing as a form of expression (it is important, however, to note, as does Alvarez, the level of elasticity in the subversions, as some zoot suiters did enter the military and women were still viewed as conquests). Alvarez clearly states that the transgressions lay in "making evident in their cultural practices that masculinity was not the sole property of men and femininity did not belong only to women" (82-83).
One of the zoot suiters challenges of dominant white masculinity was the interracial venues that challenged miscegenation. Although some public spaces remained segregated, certain jazz clubs and dance halls became spaces where white women and Mexican American and African American men could interact. The violence that erupted during the Zoot Suit Riots contains overtones that harken back to last weeks reading: the need for the white male to protect the white female body from contamination. "Vulnerable whiteness" was mapped onto the white female body, and she was conflated with white hegemony. By rescuing her from the Other, from non-normative masculinity, the dominance of white hegemony was also being solidified.
1 comment:
I think that when we look back at this period of time we see that how and what one wears in regards to clothing speaks volumes. The society we live in today still addresses much of how the youth dress if we look at the way peoples jeans are considered to be "saggin" and in many cities throughout the country this is outlawed and individuals will be given a ticket. When we look at the origination of this fashion statement it came from when one is incarcerated and this style of dress is deemed acceptable because it sends a message that the individual is homosexual. Also, back in 2005 the NBA issued a memorandum that all players were required to wear business attire which caused a backlash and many of the players felt it was racist. The Commissioner David Stern was trying to change the image of the NBA since it has been so heavily influenced by hip-hop. If you have kept up with the NBA in recent months we know that its not the dress code that is an issue but players bringing guns to the games in which to settle betting beefs. When we look at all of this many of the non-white males have embraced many of the styles of dress which is in accordance with hip hop ideology (narcissism, indepependence and aggression) while attempting to exist in a fatherless, mentorless and non-nurturing world which has been predicated upon feminine influence during their formative years. I feel that they feel more masculine by the clothing that they don which in essence gives them a "cool pose."
Post a Comment